Add a Comment
[1] Republic Act No. 386, entitled "AN ACT TO ORDAIN AND INSTITUTE THE CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES," approved on June 18, 1949.
[2] Executive Order No. 209, entitled "THE FAMILY CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES," effective on August 3, 1988.
[27] The Family Code took effect on August 3, 1988. Chapter 4, Title IV on Conjugal Partnership of Gains expressly superseded Title VI, Book I of the Civil Code on Property Relations Between Husband and Wife. Further, the Family Code provisions were also made to apply to already existing conjugal partnerships without prejudice to vested rights.
[28] Philippine National Bank v. Reyes, 796 Phil. 736, 744 (2016); and Spouses Aggabao v. Parulan, Jr., 644 Phil. 26, 36 (2010).
[29] Spouses Tarrosa v. De Leon, 611 Phil. 384, 397-398 (2009).
[30] G.R. No. 246445, March 2, 2021.
[31] Id.
[32] 125 Phil. 180 (1966). There is no specific date of marriage in the body of the Decision but the facts inferred that the spouses got married during the effectivity of the 1889 Spanish Civil Code and before the effectivity of the Civil Code. In this case, the husband sold conjugal lots on August 7, 1951 and December 20, 1951.
[33] 275 Phil. 589 (1991). There is no specific date of marriage in the body of the Decision but the facts inferred that the spouses got married during the effectivity of the Civil Code and before the effectivity of the Family Code. In this case, the husband leased the conjugal lot on March 30, 1987 without the consent of his wife. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable.
[34] 457 Phil. 120 (2003). The spouses got married in 1960. The husband sold the conjugal property without the consent of his wife on March 1, 1983. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable.
[35] 467 Phil. 1089 (2004). There is no specific date of marriage in the body of the Decision but the facts inferred that the spouses got married during the effectivity of the Civil Code and before the effectivity or the Family Code. In this case, the husband alienated the conjugal property on July 6, 1976 through a Deed of Exchange with his brother but without his wife's consent. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable. However, the Court sustained the validity of the transaction because the wife failed to seek the annulment of the voidable transaction with the 10-year prescriptive period.
[36] 478 Phil. 691 (2004). The spouses got married on January 31, 1967. The husband sold the conjugal property without his wife's consent on June 3, 1986. The Court held that the pertinent provisions of law are Articles 165, 166, and 173 of the Civil Code.
[37] 508 Phil. 299 (2005). There is no specific date of marriage in the body of the Decision but the facts inferred that the spouses got married during the effectivity of the Civil Code and before the effectivity of the Family Code. In this case, the husband sold the conjugal property on May 23, 1979 without his wife's consent. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable.
[38] 503 Phil. 220 (2005). The spouses got married before the Family Code. The husband sold the conjugal property on October 25, 1970 without his wife's consent.
[39] 623 Phil. 303 (2009). The spouses got married before the Family Code. The husband sold the conjugal property without his wife's consent on July 9, 1978.
[40] 662 Phil. 696 (2011). The spouses got married on January 16, 1954 while the conjugal property was acquired in 1968. On October 23, 1974, the husband mortgaged the conjugal property. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable.
[41] 738 Phil. 429 (2014). The spouses got married before the Family Code. The husband sold the conjugal property without his wife's consent on September 22, 1986.
[42] 123 Phil. 517 (1966). The case was decided before August 3, 1988 which means that the marriage of the spouses and the alienation of the conjugal property both transpired before the effectivity of the Family Code.
[43] 131 Phil. 790 (1968). The case was decided before August 3, 1988 which means that the marriage of the spouses and the alienation of the conjugal property both transpired before the effectivity of the Family Code.
[44] 238 Phil. 622 (1987). The case was decided before August 3, 1988 which means that the marriage of the spouses and the alienation of the conjugal property both transpired before the effectivity of the Family Code.
[45] 215 Phil. 380 (1984). The case was decided before August 3, 1988 which means that the marriage of the spouses and the alienation of the conjugal property both transpired before the effectivity of the Family Code.
[46] 848 Phil. 439 (2019). The spouses go
[2] Executive Order No. 209, entitled "THE FAMILY CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES," effective on August 3, 1988.
[27] The Family Code took effect on August 3, 1988. Chapter 4, Title IV on Conjugal Partnership of Gains expressly superseded Title VI, Book I of the Civil Code on Property Relations Between Husband and Wife. Further, the Family Code provisions were also made to apply to already existing conjugal partnerships without prejudice to vested rights.
[28] Philippine National Bank v. Reyes, 796 Phil. 736, 744 (2016); and Spouses Aggabao v. Parulan, Jr., 644 Phil. 26, 36 (2010).
[29] Spouses Tarrosa v. De Leon, 611 Phil. 384, 397-398 (2009).
[30] G.R. No. 246445, March 2, 2021.
[31] Id.
[32] 125 Phil. 180 (1966). There is no specific date of marriage in the body of the Decision but the facts inferred that the spouses got married during the effectivity of the 1889 Spanish Civil Code and before the effectivity of the Civil Code. In this case, the husband sold conjugal lots on August 7, 1951 and December 20, 1951.
[33] 275 Phil. 589 (1991). There is no specific date of marriage in the body of the Decision but the facts inferred that the spouses got married during the effectivity of the Civil Code and before the effectivity of the Family Code. In this case, the husband leased the conjugal lot on March 30, 1987 without the consent of his wife. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable.
[34] 457 Phil. 120 (2003). The spouses got married in 1960. The husband sold the conjugal property without the consent of his wife on March 1, 1983. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable.
[35] 467 Phil. 1089 (2004). There is no specific date of marriage in the body of the Decision but the facts inferred that the spouses got married during the effectivity of the Civil Code and before the effectivity or the Family Code. In this case, the husband alienated the conjugal property on July 6, 1976 through a Deed of Exchange with his brother but without his wife's consent. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable. However, the Court sustained the validity of the transaction because the wife failed to seek the annulment of the voidable transaction with the 10-year prescriptive period.
[36] 478 Phil. 691 (2004). The spouses got married on January 31, 1967. The husband sold the conjugal property without his wife's consent on June 3, 1986. The Court held that the pertinent provisions of law are Articles 165, 166, and 173 of the Civil Code.
[37] 508 Phil. 299 (2005). There is no specific date of marriage in the body of the Decision but the facts inferred that the spouses got married during the effectivity of the Civil Code and before the effectivity of the Family Code. In this case, the husband sold the conjugal property on May 23, 1979 without his wife's consent. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable.
[38] 503 Phil. 220 (2005). The spouses got married before the Family Code. The husband sold the conjugal property on October 25, 1970 without his wife's consent.
[39] 623 Phil. 303 (2009). The spouses got married before the Family Code. The husband sold the conjugal property without his wife's consent on July 9, 1978.
[40] 662 Phil. 696 (2011). The spouses got married on January 16, 1954 while the conjugal property was acquired in 1968. On October 23, 1974, the husband mortgaged the conjugal property. The Court held that the applicable laws are Articles 166 and 173 of the Civil Code, and that the transaction was voidable.
[41] 738 Phil. 429 (2014). The spouses got married before the Family Code. The husband sold the conjugal property without his wife's consent on September 22, 1986.
[42] 123 Phil. 517 (1966). The case was decided before August 3, 1988 which means that the marriage of the spouses and the alienation of the conjugal property both transpired before the effectivity of the Family Code.
[43] 131 Phil. 790 (1968). The case was decided before August 3, 1988 which means that the marriage of the spouses and the alienation of the conjugal property both transpired before the effectivity of the Family Code.
[44] 238 Phil. 622 (1987). The case was decided before August 3, 1988 which means that the marriage of the spouses and the alienation of the conjugal property both transpired before the effectivity of the Family Code.
[45] 215 Phil. 380 (1984). The case was decided before August 3, 1988 which means that the marriage of the spouses and the alienation of the conjugal property both transpired before the effectivity of the Family Code.
[46] 848 Phil. 439 (2019). The spouses go
Paste your links or Text and Make Easy Money!
PastePeso is Pastebin Site. Earn Money Online By Pasting Links on our hassle free platform where multiple kinds of publishing could be easily created. So whether you have a Blog, website, Social Media stuffs just paste links to your content share the links and receive high payouts from Revenue Share Program.
Easy Payment Anytime
Your payment procedure is very simple and you don’t have to wait for long in order to get the payment. At any time of the day you can schedule a payout. We can pay you via GCash, PayMaya, CoinsPH, Paypal or Bank Transfer.
To share this paste please copy this url and send to your friends
This text must comply to our Terms and Conditions otherwise it will be removed from our Server.
Join Now!
You will earn Money from our Revenue Share Program!
It is Free and we don't ask any money from you! Join Now!
How to Earn? Click Here for more info
You want to know more? Visit our F.A.Q Click Here
You want Proof of Payments? Click Here