Footnotes MUTYA-SUMILHIG vs. SUMILHIG, G.R. No. 230711. August 22, 2022
Author: 79467545 • 175 views • 2024-04-07 21:23:07
[36] G.R. No. 196359, May 11, 2021, [Per J. Leonen, En Banc].
[37] 335 Phil. 664 (1997) [Per J. Panganiban, En Banc].
[38] Tan-Andal v. Andal, G.R. No. 196359, May 11, 2021, [Per J. Leonen, En Banc].
[39] Id.
[47] Tan-Andal v. Andal, G.R. No. 196359, May 11, 2021, [Per J. Leonen, En Banc].
[53] Santos-Gantan v. Gantan, G.R. No. 225193, October 14, 2020, [Per J. Lazaro-Javier, First Division].
[54] 397 Phil. 840 (2000) [Per J. Panganiban, Third Division].
[55] Id. at 842.
[56] 807 Phil. 31 (2017) [Per J. Leonen, Second Division].
[57] Id. at 46.
[58] 642 Phil. 602 (2010) [Per J. Nachura, Second Division].
[59] Id. at 627.
[60] G.R. No. 225193, October 14, 2020, [Per J. Lazaro-Javier, First Division].
[61] Id.
[62] J. M. Lopez, Concurring Opinion in Tan-Andal v. Andal, G.R. No. 196359, May 11, 2021, [Per J. Leonen, En Banc].
[63] Id.
[64] Republic v. CA, 698 Phil. 257, 270 (2012) [Per J. Bersamin, First Division]; citation omitted.
[65] Tani-De La Fuente v. De La Fuente, 807 Phil. 31, 48 (2017) [Per J. Leonen, Second Division].
To share this notes please copy this URL and send it to your friends
Important :
This text must comply to our Terms and Conditions otherwise it will be removed from our Server.