Add a Comment
FOOTNOTES
44 An Act to Facilitate the Acquisition of Right-of-way, Site or Location for National Government Infrastructure Projects and for Other Purposes (2000).
45 CONST., art. III, sec. 9.
46 Municipality of Biñan v. Judge Garcia, 259 Phil. 1058, 1068–1069 (1989) [Per J. Narvasa, First Division].
47 Republic v. Judge Gingoyon, 514 Phil. 657 (2005) [Per J. Tinga, En Banc].
62 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, Rule 58, sec. 4(a) provides:
Sec. 4. Verified application and bond for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order. — A preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order may be granted only when:
(a) The application in the action or proceeding is verified, and shows facts entitling the applicant to the relief demanded. . . .
63 669 Phil. 173 (2012) [Per J. Bersamin, First Division].
64 Id. at 186, citing RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, Rule 58, secs. 1 and 3.
65 496 Phil. 853 (2005) [Per J. Tinga, Second Division].
66 Id. at 869,citingCONST., art. VIII, sec. 1.
67 501 Phil. 646 (2005) [Per J. Chico-Nazario, Second Division].
68 Id. at 664, citing Capitol Medical Center, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 258-A Phil. 271, 282 (1989) [Per J. Griño-Aquino, First Division].
70 539 Phil. 644 (2006) [Per J. Carpio Morales, Third Division].
71 Id. at 659–660, citing City of Iloilo v. Judge Legaspi, 486 Phil. 474, 490 (2004) [Per J. Chico-Nazario, Second Division] and Republic v. Judge Gingoyon, 517 Phil. 1, 13 (2006) [Per J. Tinga, En Banc].
72 G.R. No. 187604, June 25, 2012, 674 SCRA 378 [Per J. Abad, Third Division].
73 LOCAL GOVT. CODE, sec. 19 provides:
SECTION 19. Eminent Domain. - A local government unit may, through its chief executive and acting pursuant to an ordinance, exercise the power of eminent domain for public use, or purpose or welfare for the benefit of the poor and the landless, upon payment of just compensation, pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution and pertinent laws: Provided, however, That the power of eminent domain may not be exercised unless a valid and definite offer has been previously made to the owner, and such offer was not accepted: Provided, further, That the local government unit may immediately take possession of the property upon the filing of the expropriation proceedings and upon making a deposit with the proper court of at least fifteen percent (15%) of the fair market value of the property based on the current tax declaration of the property to be expropriated: Provided, finally, That the amount to be paid for the expropriated property shall be determined by the proper court, based on the fair market value at the time of the taking of the property.
74 City of Manila v. Alegar Corporation, G.R. No. 187604, June 25, 2012, 674 SCRA 378 [Per J. Abad, Third Division], citing Capitol Steel Corporation v. PHIVIDEC Industrial Authority, 539 Phil. 644, 660 (2006) [Per J. Carpio Morales, Third Division] and Visayan Refining Company v. Camus and Paredes, 40 Phil. 550, 563 (1919) [Per J. Street, En Banc].
75 233 Phil. 313 (1987) [Per J. Gutierrez, Jr., En Banc].
76 Id. at 326.
77 657 Phil. 391 (2011) [Per J. Velasco, Jr., First Division].
78 Id. at 418–419, citing FR. JOAQUIN G. BERNAS, THE 1987 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES: A COMMENTARY 391 (2003) and Heirs of Moreno v. Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority, 459 Phil. 948 (2003) [Per J. Bellosillo, Second Division].
79 459 Phil. 948 (2003) [Per J. Bellosillo, Second Division].
80 Id. at 956.
81 Id.
82 Id. at 957.
83 Id. at 960.
84 Id. at 965–968, citing Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority v. Court of Appeals, 399 Phil. 695, 706 (2000) [Per J. Gonzaga-Reyes, Third Division], G. G. BOGERT, HANDBOOK OF THE LAW OF TRUSTS, 208–210 (1963), CIVIL CODE, art. 1187, and Coleongco v. Regalado and Montilla, 92 Phil. 387, 392–393 (1952) [Per J. Felix, En Banc].
87 452 Phil. 481 (2003) [Per J. Ynares-Santiago, First Division].
88 Id. at 489–491, citing City of Manila v. Ruymann, 37 Phil. 421, 424–425 (1918) [Per J. Johnson, En Banc] and Metropolitan Water District v. De los Angeles, 55 Phil. 776, 782 (1931) [Per J. Johnson, En Banc].
89 Id. at 491–495, citing Padillo v. Court of Appeals, 422 Phil. 334, 353 (2001) [Per J. De Leon, Jr., Second Division], Manila Electric Company v. Philippine Consumers Foundation, Inc., 425 Phil. 65, 83 (2002) [Per J. Sandoval-Gutierrez, En Banc], and Cosculluela v. Court of Appeals, 247 Phil. 359, 367 (1988) [Per J. Gutierrez, Jr., Third Division].
FOLLOW US!
https://bit.ly/m/AttyEblogger
PLEASE CLICK ON the orange box below to support us!
44 An Act to Facilitate the Acquisition of Right-of-way, Site or Location for National Government Infrastructure Projects and for Other Purposes (2000).
45 CONST., art. III, sec. 9.
46 Municipality of Biñan v. Judge Garcia, 259 Phil. 1058, 1068–1069 (1989) [Per J. Narvasa, First Division].
47 Republic v. Judge Gingoyon, 514 Phil. 657 (2005) [Per J. Tinga, En Banc].
62 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, Rule 58, sec. 4(a) provides:
Sec. 4. Verified application and bond for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order. — A preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order may be granted only when:
(a) The application in the action or proceeding is verified, and shows facts entitling the applicant to the relief demanded. . . .
63 669 Phil. 173 (2012) [Per J. Bersamin, First Division].
64 Id. at 186, citing RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, Rule 58, secs. 1 and 3.
65 496 Phil. 853 (2005) [Per J. Tinga, Second Division].
66 Id. at 869,citingCONST., art. VIII, sec. 1.
67 501 Phil. 646 (2005) [Per J. Chico-Nazario, Second Division].
68 Id. at 664, citing Capitol Medical Center, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 258-A Phil. 271, 282 (1989) [Per J. Griño-Aquino, First Division].
70 539 Phil. 644 (2006) [Per J. Carpio Morales, Third Division].
71 Id. at 659–660, citing City of Iloilo v. Judge Legaspi, 486 Phil. 474, 490 (2004) [Per J. Chico-Nazario, Second Division] and Republic v. Judge Gingoyon, 517 Phil. 1, 13 (2006) [Per J. Tinga, En Banc].
72 G.R. No. 187604, June 25, 2012, 674 SCRA 378 [Per J. Abad, Third Division].
73 LOCAL GOVT. CODE, sec. 19 provides:
SECTION 19. Eminent Domain. - A local government unit may, through its chief executive and acting pursuant to an ordinance, exercise the power of eminent domain for public use, or purpose or welfare for the benefit of the poor and the landless, upon payment of just compensation, pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution and pertinent laws: Provided, however, That the power of eminent domain may not be exercised unless a valid and definite offer has been previously made to the owner, and such offer was not accepted: Provided, further, That the local government unit may immediately take possession of the property upon the filing of the expropriation proceedings and upon making a deposit with the proper court of at least fifteen percent (15%) of the fair market value of the property based on the current tax declaration of the property to be expropriated: Provided, finally, That the amount to be paid for the expropriated property shall be determined by the proper court, based on the fair market value at the time of the taking of the property.
74 City of Manila v. Alegar Corporation, G.R. No. 187604, June 25, 2012, 674 SCRA 378 [Per J. Abad, Third Division], citing Capitol Steel Corporation v. PHIVIDEC Industrial Authority, 539 Phil. 644, 660 (2006) [Per J. Carpio Morales, Third Division] and Visayan Refining Company v. Camus and Paredes, 40 Phil. 550, 563 (1919) [Per J. Street, En Banc].
75 233 Phil. 313 (1987) [Per J. Gutierrez, Jr., En Banc].
76 Id. at 326.
77 657 Phil. 391 (2011) [Per J. Velasco, Jr., First Division].
78 Id. at 418–419, citing FR. JOAQUIN G. BERNAS, THE 1987 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES: A COMMENTARY 391 (2003) and Heirs of Moreno v. Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority, 459 Phil. 948 (2003) [Per J. Bellosillo, Second Division].
79 459 Phil. 948 (2003) [Per J. Bellosillo, Second Division].
80 Id. at 956.
81 Id.
82 Id. at 957.
83 Id. at 960.
84 Id. at 965–968, citing Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority v. Court of Appeals, 399 Phil. 695, 706 (2000) [Per J. Gonzaga-Reyes, Third Division], G. G. BOGERT, HANDBOOK OF THE LAW OF TRUSTS, 208–210 (1963), CIVIL CODE, art. 1187, and Coleongco v. Regalado and Montilla, 92 Phil. 387, 392–393 (1952) [Per J. Felix, En Banc].
87 452 Phil. 481 (2003) [Per J. Ynares-Santiago, First Division].
88 Id. at 489–491, citing City of Manila v. Ruymann, 37 Phil. 421, 424–425 (1918) [Per J. Johnson, En Banc] and Metropolitan Water District v. De los Angeles, 55 Phil. 776, 782 (1931) [Per J. Johnson, En Banc].
89 Id. at 491–495, citing Padillo v. Court of Appeals, 422 Phil. 334, 353 (2001) [Per J. De Leon, Jr., Second Division], Manila Electric Company v. Philippine Consumers Foundation, Inc., 425 Phil. 65, 83 (2002) [Per J. Sandoval-Gutierrez, En Banc], and Cosculluela v. Court of Appeals, 247 Phil. 359, 367 (1988) [Per J. Gutierrez, Jr., Third Division].
FOLLOW US!
https://bit.ly/m/AttyEblogger
PLEASE CLICK ON the orange box below to support us!
Paste your links or Text and Make Easy Money!
PastePeso is Pastebin Site. Earn Money Online By Pasting Links on our hassle free platform where multiple kinds of publishing could be easily created. So whether you have a Blog, website, Social Media stuffs just paste links to your content share the links and receive high payouts from Revenue Share Program.
Easy Payment Anytime
Your payment procedure is very simple and you don’t have to wait for long in order to get the payment. At any time of the day you can schedule a payout. We can pay you via GCash, PayMaya, CoinsPH, Paypal or Bank Transfer.
To share this paste please copy this url and send to your friends
This text must comply to our Terms and Conditions otherwise it will be removed from our Server.
Join Now!
You will earn Money from our Revenue Share Program!
It is Free and we don't ask any money from you! Join Now!
How to Earn? Click Here for more info
You want to know more? Visit our F.A.Q Click Here
You want Proof of Payments? Click Here