Footnotes QUIOGUE, JR., vs. QUIOGUE, G.R. No. 203992. August 22, 2022
Author: 79467545 • 208 views • 2024-04-07 20:50:47
[1] NATASHA LUNN, CONVERSATIONS ON LOVE 286 (2021).
[2] Tan-Andal v. Andal, G.R. No. 196359, May 11, 2021.
[31] G.R. No. 196359, May 11, 2021.
[32] 310 Phil. 21, 40 (1995).
[33] 335 Phil. 664, 691 (1997).
[34] Tan-Andal v. Andal, supra note 31; See also Hernandez v. Court of Appeals, 377 Phil. 919, 932 (1999).
[35] Supra note 29 at 850.
[36] Tan-Andal v. Andal, supra note 31; citing Ngo Te v. Yu-Te, 598 Phil. 666, 678 (2009) and Kalaw v. Fernandez, 750 Phil. 482, 497-498 (2015).
[37] Tan-Andal v. Andal, supra note 31.
[38] Article 1 of the Family Code.
[39] Article 55 of the Family Code.
[40] Tan-Andal v. Andal, supra note 31.
[51] Tan-Andal v. Andal, supra note 31.
[52] Rollo, p. 182.
[53] Id. at 179 & 191.
[54] Id. at 182.
[55] Rollo, pp. 193-194.
To share this notes please copy this URL and send it to your friends
Important :
This text must comply to our Terms and Conditions otherwise it will be removed from our Server.